Skip to content

All sites

Pinacate and Gran Desierto (El Pinacate)

Unreviewed draft

This page was built from a teammate-supplied list. The text is teammate-written, unreviewed. Sources pending.

Summary

not provided

Location

Country
Mexico (Sonora)
Coordinates
31.77, -113.50
Elevation (m)
600
Year first used as an analog
1970

Terrain and geology

not provided

Climate

not provided

Parameters matched

not provided

Why it is an analog

Apollo heritage site with world-class maar craters in a hyper-arid setting.

Key differences: where the analogy breaks down

Very hot; volcanic not impact; dunes and creosote shrubs.

Experiments done

Apollo crews trained on maar craters (Elegante, MacDougal) and basalt flows; later desert ecology and volcanology studies.

Experiments proposed

Large-crater rim navigation; low-albedo basalt thermal tests; lander plume-surface interaction on fine dune sand nearby; dust-devil observations.

How to adjust it

Use winter night ops; seed basalt simulant patches; shade tents for thermal-extreme tests.

Access

not provided

Hazards

not provided

Sources

Sources pending (no sources in CSV).

v1 score, percentile and overlap flag

A descriptive lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is not a test, and a high percentile here does not show that this is a good analog.

v1 used this site
No. The nearest v1 site, "sf volcanic field", is about 439.1 km away.

Stored v1 scores near Pinacate and Gran Desierto (El Pinacate)
Score viewResultPercentileScoreDistance to tile (km)Overlap flag
Connecting Ridge C1, BaseScored91.418.46.1Not in a flagged tile
Connecting Ridge C1, Landing and mobilityScored96.721.06.1In a flagged tile
Connecting Ridge C1, Power and nightScored91.413.36.1Not in a flagged tile
Shackleton rim, BaseScored91.537.86.1Not in a flagged tile
Shackleton rim, Landing and mobilityScored98.843.26.1In a flagged tile
Shackleton rim, Power and nightScored91.527.46.1Not in a flagged tile

Overlap flag: whether the tile used for the score is one v1 flagged as stable in its top group across the Monte Carlo runs.

What these scores can and cannot tell you
  • This is a lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is descriptive and is not a test of the method.
  • A site is matched to the best-scoring tile that passed the gates within the match radius. A different radius would give different numbers.
  • Tiles are large compared with most sites, so a score describes the surrounding area, not the site itself.
  • Scores exist only for tiles that passed the land-cover and data gates. A gated-out or unscored site has no score, which says nothing about how good an analog it is.
  • Percentile is the share of scored tiles in that view with a lower score.
  • The Moon score is effectively terrain only. Mars is a low-confidence secondary result.
  • v1 failed its negative controls, so a high percentile here does not show that a site is a good analog.
  • The ranking is not checked against independent data. Gravity, air, dust and radiation are not scored.
  • Sites are compared with views of their own body only.
  • Match radius: 20 km, the radius v1 used.