Myvatn and Krafla lava fields
Unreviewed draft
This page was built from a teammate-supplied list. The text is teammate-written, unreviewed. Sources pending.
Summary
not provided
Location
- Country
- Iceland
- Coordinates
- 65.65, -16.80
- Elevation (m)
- 400
- Year first used as an analog
- 1965
Terrain and geology
not provided
Climate
not provided
Parameters matched
not provided
Why it is an analog
Apollo training on young basaltic fissure flows.
Key differences: where the analogy breaks down
Lakes and vegetation; rootless cones require water (not lunar).
Experiments done
Apollo crews trained here in 1965 and 1967 on fissure-fed basalt, spatter ramparts and rootless cones; later volcanology of the Krafla Fires (1724-29, 1975-84) eruptions used to interpret lunar rilles and fissures.
Experiments proposed
Fresh-lava traverses; geothermal-powered habitat concepts; fissure and graben mapping.
How to adjust it
Restrict tests to the 1975-84 Krafla flows (bare); overlay basaltic simulant lanes; use geothermal heat to run thermal-cycling tests alongside cold ground.
Access
not provided
Hazards
not provided
Sources
Sources pending (no sources in CSV).
v1 score, percentile and overlap flag
A descriptive lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is not a test, and a high percentile here does not show that this is a good analog.
v1 used this site
Unknown. The nearest v1 site, "askja", is about 69.0 km away, and the files cannot say whether v1 meant the same place.
| Score view | Result | Percentile | Score | Distance to tile (km) | Overlap flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecting Ridge C1, Base | Scored | 89.7 | 15.5 | 16.3 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Connecting Ridge C1, Landing and mobility | Scored | 95.5 | 17.7 | 16.3 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Connecting Ridge C1, Power and night | Scored | 89.7 | 11.3 | 16.3 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Base | Scored | 90.8 | 36.8 | 4.0 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Landing and mobility | Scored | 98.4 | 42.1 | 4.0 | In a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Power and night | Scored | 90.8 | 26.7 | 4.0 | Not in a flagged tile |
Overlap flag: whether the tile used for the score is one v1 flagged as stable in its top group across the Monte Carlo runs.
What these scores can and cannot tell you
- This is a lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is descriptive and is not a test of the method.
- A site is matched to the best-scoring tile that passed the gates within the match radius. A different radius would give different numbers.
- Tiles are large compared with most sites, so a score describes the surrounding area, not the site itself.
- Scores exist only for tiles that passed the land-cover and data gates. A gated-out or unscored site has no score, which says nothing about how good an analog it is.
- Percentile is the share of scored tiles in that view with a lower score.
- The Moon score is effectively terrain only. Mars is a low-confidence secondary result.
- v1 failed its negative controls, so a high percentile here does not show that a site is a good analog.
- The ranking is not checked against independent data. Gravity, air, dust and radiation are not scored.
- Sites are compared with views of their own body only.
- Match radius: 20 km, the radius v1 used.