Skip to content

All sites

Mars Desert Research Station (lunar crews)

Unreviewed draft

This page was built from a teammate-supplied list. The text is teammate-written, unreviewed. Sources pending.

Summary

not provided

Location

Country
USA (Utah)
Coordinates
38.41, -110.79
Elevation (m)
1400
Year first used as an analog
2009

Terrain and geology

not provided

Climate

not provided

Parameters matched

not provided

Why it is an analog

Widely used habitat analog with lunar rotations.

Key differences: where the analogy breaks down

Sedimentary rocks unlike the Moon; thick air.

Experiments done

ILEWG EuroMoonMars and other Moon-focused crew rotations since 2009: EVA protocols, habitat ops, lunar-instrument field tests, crew autonomy studies.

Experiments proposed

Lunar-base procedures with lunar-day/night scheduling; crew autonomy under delay; dust-management and airlock tests; geology EVAs with sample triage.

How to adjust it

Simulant patches for EVA sampling; 14-day 'lunar night' power-down scenarios; dust airlock trials.

Access

not provided

Hazards

not provided

Sources

Sources pending (no sources in CSV).

v1 score, percentile and overlap flag

A descriptive lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is not a test, and a high percentile here does not show that this is a good analog.

v1 used this site
Unknown. The nearest v1 site, "mdrs utah", is about 0.5 km away, and the files cannot say whether v1 meant the same place.

Stored v1 scores near Mars Desert Research Station (lunar crews)
Score viewResultPercentileScoreDistance to tile (km)Overlap flag
Connecting Ridge C1, BaseScored92.923.213.2Not in a flagged tile
Connecting Ridge C1, Landing and mobilityScored97.726.513.2Not in a flagged tile
Connecting Ridge C1, Power and nightScored92.916.913.2Not in a flagged tile
Shackleton rim, BaseScored93.641.613.2Not in a flagged tile
Shackleton rim, Landing and mobilityScored99.647.613.2In a flagged tile
Shackleton rim, Power and nightScored93.630.213.2Not in a flagged tile

Overlap flag: whether the tile used for the score is one v1 flagged as stable in its top group across the Monte Carlo runs.

What these scores can and cannot tell you
  • This is a lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is descriptive and is not a test of the method.
  • A site is matched to the best-scoring tile that passed the gates within the match radius. A different radius would give different numbers.
  • Tiles are large compared with most sites, so a score describes the surrounding area, not the site itself.
  • Scores exist only for tiles that passed the land-cover and data gates. A gated-out or unscored site has no score, which says nothing about how good an analog it is.
  • Percentile is the share of scored tiles in that view with a lower score.
  • The Moon score is effectively terrain only. Mars is a low-confidence secondary result.
  • v1 failed its negative controls, so a high percentile here does not show that a site is a good analog.
  • The ranking is not checked against independent data. Gravity, air, dust and radiation are not scored.
  • Sites are compared with views of their own body only.
  • Match radius: 20 km, the radius v1 used.