Lunar Crater Volcanic Field
Unreviewed draft
This page was built from a teammate-supplied list. The text is teammate-written, unreviewed. Sources pending.
Summary
not provided
Location
- Country
- USA (Nevada)
- Coordinates
- 38.38, -116.07
- Elevation (m)
- 1800
- Year first used as an analog
- not provided
Terrain and geology
not provided
Climate
not provided
Parameters matched
not provided
Why it is an analog
Lunar-looking basaltic field in the dry Great Basin.
Key differences: where the analogy breaks down
Volcanic craters, not impacts; desert vegetation.
Experiments done
Planetary-geology field courses and volcanic-morphology research on maars, cinder cones and basalt flows that resemble lunar dark-halo craters and domes; named for its lunar look in the 1860s.
Experiments proposed
Maar-rim operations; crater-origin training; thermal-inertia mapping of basalt vs cinder.
How to adjust it
Seed boulder fields at Lunar Crater rim; simulant lanes across flows; floodlit night traverses for low-angle light.
Access
not provided
Hazards
not provided
Sources
Sources pending (no sources in CSV).
v1 score, percentile and overlap flag
A descriptive lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is not a test, and a high percentile here does not show that this is a good analog.
v1 used this site
No. The nearest v1 site, "mdrs utah", is about 460.1 km away.
| Score view | Result | Percentile | Score | Distance to tile (km) | Overlap flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecting Ridge C1, Base | Scored | 93.5 | 25.3 | 16.5 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Connecting Ridge C1, Landing and mobility | Scored | 98.0 | 28.6 | 16.5 | In a flagged tile |
| Connecting Ridge C1, Power and night | Scored | 93.5 | 18.4 | 16.5 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Base | Scored | 93.5 | 41.3 | 9.2 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Landing and mobility | Scored | 99.5 | 47.3 | 9.2 | In a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Power and night | Scored | 93.5 | 30.0 | 9.2 | Not in a flagged tile |
Overlap flag: whether the tile used for the score is one v1 flagged as stable in its top group across the Monte Carlo runs.
What these scores can and cannot tell you
- This is a lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is descriptive and is not a test of the method.
- A site is matched to the best-scoring tile that passed the gates within the match radius. A different radius would give different numbers.
- Tiles are large compared with most sites, so a score describes the surrounding area, not the site itself.
- Scores exist only for tiles that passed the land-cover and data gates. A gated-out or unscored site has no score, which says nothing about how good an analog it is.
- Percentile is the share of scored tiles in that view with a lower score.
- The Moon score is effectively terrain only. Mars is a low-confidence secondary result.
- v1 failed its negative controls, so a high percentile here does not show that a site is a good analog.
- The ranking is not checked against independent data. Gravity, air, dust and radiation are not scored.
- Sites are compared with views of their own body only.
- Match radius: 20 km, the radius v1 used.