Askja caldera
Unreviewed draft
This page was built from a teammate-supplied list. The text is teammate-written, unreviewed. Sources pending.
Summary
not provided
Location
- Country
- Iceland
- Coordinates
- 65.05, -16.78
- Elevation (m)
- 1100
- Year first used as an analog
- 1965
Terrain and geology
not provided
Climate
not provided
Parameters matched
not provided
Why it is an analog
Apollo training landscape: barren, cold basalt.
Key differences: where the analogy breaks down
Wet, glacial; mid-high latitude light but not lunar polar; Earth atmosphere.
Experiments done
Apollo crews trained on barren basaltic terrain and pumice; later planetary field studies (Mars and Moon).
Experiments proposed
Barren-basalt EVA traverses; cold-weather equipment; dust and sand transport; rover tests on unvegetated volcanic sand plains.
How to adjust it
Summer ops with simulant overlays; use the 2 km window that excludes lakes.
Access
not provided
Hazards
not provided
Sources
Sources pending (no sources in CSV).
v1 score, percentile and overlap flag
A descriptive lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is not a test, and a high percentile here does not show that this is a good analog.
v1 used this site
Yes. This place matches the v1 site "askja", about 2.6 km away.
| Score view | Result | Percentile | Score | Distance to tile (km) | Overlap flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecting Ridge C1, Base | Scored | 95.7 | 33.5 | 8.1 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Connecting Ridge C1, Landing and mobility | Scored | 99.1 | 37.9 | 8.1 | In a flagged tile |
| Connecting Ridge C1, Power and night | Scored | 95.7 | 24.4 | 8.1 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Base | Scored | 92.3 | 39.2 | 7.2 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Landing and mobility | Scored | 99.2 | 44.8 | 7.2 | Not in a flagged tile |
| Shackleton rim, Power and night | Scored | 92.3 | 28.4 | 7.2 | Not in a flagged tile |
Overlap flag: whether the tile used for the score is one v1 flagged as stable in its top group across the Monte Carlo runs.
What these scores can and cannot tell you
- This is a lookup of scores v1 already stored. It is descriptive and is not a test of the method.
- A site is matched to the best-scoring tile that passed the gates within the match radius. A different radius would give different numbers.
- Tiles are large compared with most sites, so a score describes the surrounding area, not the site itself.
- Scores exist only for tiles that passed the land-cover and data gates. A gated-out or unscored site has no score, which says nothing about how good an analog it is.
- Percentile is the share of scored tiles in that view with a lower score.
- The Moon score is effectively terrain only. Mars is a low-confidence secondary result.
- v1 failed its negative controls, so a high percentile here does not show that a site is a good analog.
- The ranking is not checked against independent data. Gravity, air, dust and radiation are not scored.
- Sites are compared with views of their own body only.
- Match radius: 20 km, the radius v1 used.